Dealing with Gurstel Law Firm in Minnesota: What You Need to Know

Who is Gurstel law firm?

Gurstel Law Firm is a debt-collection law firm headquartered in Golden Valley, Minnesota. Their attorneys regularly appear in Minnesota courts and also handle collection matters in Arizona, California, Iowa, Nebraska, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming.

They represent major banks, credit-card issuers, and debt buyers, and they’re experienced at moving quickly toward judgment.

---

If You’re Sued by Gurstel: Your Options

If you’ve been served with a summons and complaint, you typically have three paths:

1. Defend the case – Serve a written Answer within 21 days and raise any valid defenses (e.g., statute of limitations, identity/authorization issues, assignment proof for debt buyers).

2. Negotiate a settlement – A timely Answer often improves leverage and may reduce total cost/risk.

3. File bankruptcy – For some clients, Chapter 7 or 13 stops the lawsuit and addresses other debts.

Start here: Minnesota Debt Collection Lawsuit Guide: Part 1—Summons & Complaint and Part 2—The Answer

Want a roadmap after you answer? Part 3—After the Answer

Heads-up: Gurstel’s lawyers know Minnesota court rules well. Missing the 21-day Answer deadline often leads to a default judgment. This happens without a hearing and no judge reviews the case.

---

If Gurstel Is Garnishing You: How to Stop It

If your wages or bank account are being garnished, you generally have four ways to stop it:

1. Claim an exemption (if you qualify)

2. Negotiate a settlement

3. Vacate the judgment (in limited circumstances)

4. File bankruptcy

Learn the pros/cons: Minnesota Garnishment Guide

---

Why Talk to a Lawyer Early?

• The 21-day Answer deadline is unforgiving.

• Good defenses can be waived if not raised.

• Even if settlement is your goal, a prompt, proper Answer can improve the deal.

• A judgment opens the door to garnishment and liens.

---

Gurstel Law FAQs

How long do I have to respond to a Gurstel lawsuit in Minnesota? You must serve a written Answer within 21 days of being served, or the creditor can get a default judgment administratively.

My summons doesn’t have a court file number, is it real or fake? Real. Minnesota allows “pocket filing,” so collectors can serve before filing with the court. You still must Answer.

Do I have defenses against a Gurstel lawsuit? Possibly. Common defenses include statute of limitations, unauthorized use/fraud, payment/settlement, and where applicable, a failure to prove assignment by a debt buyer. The right defenses depend on your facts.

Can you help if Gurstel is already garnishing me? Yes. We’ll assess exemptions, settlement, vacating the judgment, or bankruptcy based on your goals and risk.

---

Need help dealing with Gurstel Law Firm?
Schedule a consult with debt defense lawyer Todd Murray.

Since 2009, Todd has helped hundreds of Minnesotans dealing with debt collection by Gurstel Law. His work has saved his clients lots of money and many sleepless nights. Todd’s clients describe him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

In Minnesota and ready to talk to a lawyer about bankruptcy?
Schedule a free consult with bankruptcy lawyer Todd Murray.

Since 2009, Todd has helped hundreds of Minnesotans get out of debt. His work has saved his clients millions of dollars (and many sleepless nights) in the process. Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

Debt collectors can’t lie to you

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act forbids a debt collector from making any false or misleading statements when they are attempting to collect a debt. If a debt collector lied to you, here's what you need to know about your rights under the FDCPA.

The FDCPA applies to “debt collectors” collecting “consumer debts”

The FDCPA only covers a debt collector that is collecting a debt for someone else. It does not apply to a creditor collecting its own debts. So if the false statement was made by a bank or credit card company that is collecting its own debts, the FDCPA doesn’t apply. But the FDCPA does apply to collection agencies, debt buyers, and law firms who are collecting debts for someone else.

In addition, the FDCPA only applies when the debt being collected is a consumer debt. This is a debt used for personal, family, or household purposes. If the debt was incurred for a business, the FDCPA doesn’t apply.

Common debt collection lies

Although the FDCPA is clear that virtually any false statement is a violation, there are some collection lies and misleading statements that seem to happen frequently. These include:

• Telling you that you owe a debt that you already paid or that was discharged in bankruptcy

• Threatening to sue or garnish you after the statute of limitations has expired;

• Incorrectly reporting information on your credit report;

• Mis-stating your rights in student loan collections;

• Claiming that you personally owe a debt you have no obligation to pay, such as a debt for an ex-spouse or a deceased relative;

• Incorrectly stating the balance of your account (possibly because of unauthorized fees or uncredited payments);

• Suggesting that they are affiliated with an attorney when they are not;

The false statement probably has to be "material"

Although the FDCPA doesn't say anything about it, many courts have adopted a rule that the false statement has to be "material." This generally means that it's not enough to show merely that the debt collector lied to you. You must also show that they lie impacted your ability to evaluate your options in some way. In my opinion, any statement about the balance of the account, the legal status of the account, your legal rights, or the collector's legal remedies should be considered material.

If a debt collector lied to you, hold them accountable under the FDCPA

The FDCPA gives consumers the power to sue a debt collector that violates the law. It’s a great way to stop collection harassment cold and to hold the debt collector accountable for its illegal conduct. Under the FDCPA, a successful claim gets you:

• Up to $1,000 in statutory damages (even if you’ve suffered no monetary loss);

• Provable actual damages (including for emotional distress);

• Your attorney fees and court costs must be paid by the collector

Most consumer lawyers, including me, handle FDCPA lawsuits on a contingency fee. This means that you don’t pay us any fees unless I recover money for you and those fees come from the collector’s pocket, not yours. Congress wrote the FDCPA this way to incentivize people to enforce the FDCPA and help the government regulate debt collectors and ensure compliance with the law.

---

Ready to talk to a lawyer about stopping debt harassment?
Schedule a free consult with FDCPA attorney Todd Murray.

Todd has been suing harassing debt collectors since 2009. He has recovered hundreds of thousands of dollars for his clients and has held the debt collection industry accountable when it resorts to illegal collection tactics. Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

The Minnesota Garnishment Guide: Part 1—Garnishment Basics

This is part one of a four-part series about garnishment in Minnesota:

Part 2—How to Stop Garnishment
Part 3—Claiming Garnishment Exemptions
Part 4—Wrongful Garnishment

---

What is garnishment?

If your paycheck suddenly shrank or your bank account was frozen, you may have been hit with a garnishment. This is one of the most stressful moments Minnesota consumers face.

Garnishment allows debt collectors to take money directly from your wages or bank account to pay a debt. Although Minnesota law technically permits garnishment before a judgment, most garnishments happen after a court has entered a judgment against you.

Collectors must follow strict legal procedures, and when they don’t, the garnishment may be wrongful or even illegal.

---

Bank Garnishment Basics

Here’s how bank garnishment works:

• A debt collector sends a garnishment summons to your bank.

• On the day the bank processes it, the bank must freeze and seize the money in your account.

• You don’t get advance notice — you only learn after the money is taken.

This can cause overdrafts, bounced checks, and other financial chaos. Minnesota law gives you some protections, but you have to act quickly to claim them.

---

Wage garnishment basics

Wage garnishment starts with a Notice of Intent to Garnish sent to you. The debt collector must then wait 10 days before sending a garnishment summons to your employer.

Once your employer receives the summons, they must take up to 25% of your after-tax wages each pay period until the debt is paid.

For many Minnesota workers, this means losing hundreds of dollars from every paycheck.

---

What’s Next in This Series

This is Part 1 of our Minnesota Garnishment Guide. Next, we cover:

Part 2—How to Stop Garnishment
Part 3—Claiming Garnishment Exemptions
Part 4—Wrongful Garnishment

---

Ready to talk to a lawyer about garnishment?
Schedule a consult with debt defense lawyer Todd Murray.

Since 2009, Todd has helped hundreds of Minnesotans defend garnishments. His work has saved his clients millions of dollars (and many sleepless nights) in the process. Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

The Minnesota Garnishment Guide: Part 2—How to Stop Garnishment

This is part two of a four-part series about garnishment in Minnesota:

Part 1—Garnishment Basics
Part 3—Claiming Garnishment Exemptions
Part 4—Wrongful Garnishment

How to Stop a Garnishment in Minnesota

There are four ways to stop a garnishment in Minnesota: (1) claim an exemption; (2) negotiate a settlement; (3) vacate the judgment; and (4) file bankruptcy. Here’s an in-depth look at each of these options.

Option #1: If you get need-based assistance, claim an exemption

The first way to stop a garnishment in Minnesota is to claim an exemption. Exemptions are legal reasons why your paycheck or bank account are protected from garnishment. Exemption laws vary by state. In Minnesota, some common exemptions are:

• Creditors cannot take your social security or other need-based government aid from your bank account.

• If you received need-based government aid within the last 6 months, your wages cannot be garnished at all.

• In most other cases, creditors can only take 25% of your paycheck.

Important caveat: if you’re being garnished for child support, alimony, or many types of government debt (including federal student loans) the rules are different. 

WHO IS CLAIMING AN EXEMPTION THE RIGHT OPTION FOR?

Anyone who qualifies for it. If your circumstances allow, you should assert your exemption to stop the garnishment and get your money back. But remember, claiming an exemption doesn’t make the debt go away, it just means that your money is protected from garnishment for the time being.

Option #2: If you can afford it, negotiate a settlement

A second way to stop a garnishment is to negotiate a settlement with the collector. The idea here is to get the creditor to stop the garnishment in exchange for voluntary payment.

WHO IS DEBT SETTLEMENT THE RIGHT OPTION FOR?

Anyone who can afford to pay a reasonable settlement to fully resolve the debt. If you have many debts and can’t realistically afford to settle all of them, this option probably isn’t the best choice for you.

Also, keep in mind that if the creditor is garnishing your wages for, say, $250 a month, they’re not going to agree to a voluntary settlement where you pay $100 a month. Your best bet to settle when a wage garnishment is already in place is to see if the creditor will take a lump sum payment for less than the full balance. Some creditors prefer the certainty of having some money right away rather than waiting months to get paid in full through garnishment.

Option # 3: If you meet the necessary criteria, vacate the judgment.

Another way to stop a garnishment is to vacate (undo) the underlying court judgment. If you take away the judgment, you take away the right to garnish.

To vacate a judgment in Minnesota, you’ll have to convince the judge that you have a really good reason for not responding to the creditor’s lawsuit and that you have a defense to the creditor’s claim. Further, in most cases you have to vacate the judgment within a year of its entry. 

WHO IS VACATING A JUDGMENT THE RIGHT OPTION FOR?

Anyone who didn’t receive the creditor’s lawsuit or who had a really good reason for not responding to it. For a couple of reasons, though, this is a long-shot option for most people.

• First, you must provide strong evidence that you never received the creditor’s lawsuit or that you had a good reason for not responding. Just telling the judge “I never got it” or “I didn’t know I needed to respond” isn’t going to cut it. 

• Second, you have to show the court that you have a valid defense to the debt. 

• Third, while vacating a judgment stops a garnishment in the short term, the debt doesn’t go away--you just go back to the beginning of the case. 

Because of these challenges, the vast majority of people would be better off choosing one of the other three options to stop a garnishment.

Option # 4: If you have other debts, consider filing bankruptcy

The fourth way to stop a garnishment is to file bankruptcy. Bankruptcy stops wage garnishments and bank levies immediately and may allow you to get the garnished money back. Plus, unlike claiming an exemption or vacating the judgment, bankruptcy also wipes out the debt itself in most cases.

Who is bankruptcy the right option for?

Anyone who has multiple debts. While you might be able to settle one or two accounts, chances are you’re not going to be able to settle multiple debts unless you have access to significant amounts of money.

What’s Next in This Series

This is Part 1 of our Minnesota Garnishment Guide. Next, we cover:

Part 1—Garnishment Basics
Part 3—Claiming Garnishment Exemptions
Part 4—Wrongful Garnishment

Ready to talk to a lawyer about garnishment?
Schedule a consult with debt defense lawyer Todd Murray.

Since 2009, Todd has helped hundreds of Minnesotans defend garnishments. His work has saved his clients millions of dollars (and many sleepless nights) in the process. Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

The Minnesota Garnishment Guide: Part 3: Garnishment Exemptions

This is part three of a four-part series about garnishment in Minnesota:

Part 1—Garnishment Basics
Part 2—How to Stop Garnishment
Part 4—Wrongful Garnishment

---

What Are Garnishment Exemptions?

Certain monies are protected, or exempt, from garnishment in Minnesota. For example, a debt collector may not keep most forms of need-based government aid. Some of the most common forms of need-based aid are social security, supplemental security income (SSI), energy assistance, and medical assistance (MA). Other types of assistance that are exempt include: Minnesota family investment program (MFIP), emergency assistance and emergency general assistance (EA & EGA), work first program, general assistance medical care (GAMC), and Minnesota supplemental assistance (MSA).

Another important garnishment exemption protects 75% of your paycheck. Minnesota law also provides that child support, unemployment benefits, disability, workers' compensation, veterans’ benefits, some insurance settlement proceeds, and many pension plans are exempt from garnishment.

In addition, while it's not technically an exemption, a debt collector can't keep money from a joint bank account that doesn't belong to the judgment debtor.

---

Claiming garnishment exemptions for wage garnishment

If you're facing a wage garnishment, it's important to know that a debt collector can only take 25% of your after-tax wages. And if you make only the federal minimum wage (or less) your wages are usually completely exempt from garnishment. Further, if you receive any form of need-based aid, such as those described above, your wages are totally exempt from garnishment. Minnesota law provides for this exemption if you currently receive need-based aid, or if you received any need-based aid in the last 6 months. This is an important provision for Minnesotans receiving energy assistance. Most recipients of energy assistance receive it from October through March, which make the recipient's wages exempt for the entire year if she re-enrolls in the program the following season.

To claim an exemption, it's important first to understand the garnishment process. For a wage garnishment, the debt collector must provide you with a garnishment exemption form notifying you of their intent to garnish and an exemption form 10 days before starting the wage garnishment. To claim exemptions from a wage garnishment, all you have to do is write the appropriate garnishment exemptions on the form and mail it back to the debt collector. It's critical to do this immediately, or at least within 10 days of receiving the form. You should also provide proof of your exemption, such as your benefit notice, with the exemption form.

---

Claiming garnishment exemptions for bank garnishment

For a bank garnishment, you won't get notice of the garnishment until 5 days after the bank freezes your money. Fill out the garnishment exemption form that the bank and debt collector mail to you, noting the appropriate exemption. You also need to provide proof that the funds that were seized by the bank arose from an exempt source. This last point is the cause of considerable confusion. It's not enough to show the debt collector that you receive exempt money, you also have to prove that the funds that were actually seized contained this exempt money. Debt collectors will refer to this as “tracing”. Sending the debt collector a copy of your bank statements that show the deposit of exempt funds, along with your benefit statements will usually accomplish the task.

If you merely mail the completed exemption form to the debt collector, and fail to provide the required tracing, the debt collector will probably object to your exemption and refuse to return your money. If this happens, you should schedule a court hearing in front of a judge to determine whether your funds are exempt. Court administration will help you set up the hearing and provide notice of the hearing to the debt collector. On the day of your hearing, be sure to bring proof of your exemption AND bank statements proving the funds seized were from an exempt source. Failure to do so could delay the court's decision or could lead to the court denying your exemption.

---

A word of caution

Finally, it's important to understand that claiming an exemption when you're not entitled to one could lead to the court ordering you to pay a penalty to the debt collector. Make sure any exemptions you claim are legitimate.

---

What’s Next in This Series

This is Part 3 of our Minnesota Garnishment Guide. Next, we cover:

Part 1—Garnishment Basics
Part 2—How to Stop Garnishment
Part 4—Wrongful Garnishment

The Minnesota Garnishment Guide: Part 4—Wrongful Garnishment

This is part four of a four-part series about garnishment in Minnesota:

Part 1—Garnishment Basics
Part 2—How to Stop Garnishment
Part 3—Claiming Garnishment Exemptions

---

What is Wrongful Garnishment?

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act prohibits debt collectors from doing anything that is unfair, untrue, harassing, or abusive. It also forbids debt collectors from taking action that they can’t legally take. Here are some typical FDCPA violations related to garnishments:

Making false statements in the garnishment paperwork

This could include things like: (1) claiming that they have a judgment when they don’t; (2) misstating the balance due; (3) incorrectly describing possible exemptions; and (4) instructing your employer to hold money longer than allowed (in Minnesota, 180 days).

continuing to garnish when the collector knows you’re exempt

If you’ve claimed a valid garnishment exemption and given the debt collector complete proof of your exemption, it’s illegal for them to continue with the
garnishment process. This includes making you appear at an exemption hearing when the collector already has proof of your exemption.

Threatening to garnish all of your wages

In Minnesota, a debt collector can only garnish 25% of your wages. So if a collector is lying if they threaten to garnish 100% of your wages.

garnishing for a debt you’ve already paid

If you’ve already paid the debt in full, you can’t be garnished for more money. Similarly, if you’ve negotiated a payment plan to resolve a debt and you’re current on that payment plan, a debt collector can’t garnish you.

GARNISHING MORE THAN YOU OWE

Recently, I’ve seen more instances of collectors garnishing far more than is owed. This is usually done through a loophole in the garnishment statutes that allow garnishment of more than one bank account at the same time.

Say, for example, the consumer owes a judgment of $4,000. The collector sends out two bank garnishments on the same day, one to the consumer’s account at US Bank, the other the an account at Wells Fargo. The US Bank account has $2,000 in it and the Wells Fargo account has $3,000 in it. So $5,000 gets garnished for a $4,000 judgment. If the debt collector immediately releases the extra $1,000 back to the consumer, that’s probably OK. But if it holds the money for longer, that’s probably wrongful.

Court judgment was vacated or satisfied

Most garnishments happen after a court judgment has been entered. What if the court judgment is vacated or satisfied, though? If the collection judgment is wiped out, then the collector's power to conduct a garnishment is wiped out.

Improper pre-judgment garnishment

Although most Minnesota garnishments happen after a judgment has been entered, the law does allow pre-judgment garnishments in limited circumstances. The way to tell if it’s a prejudgment garnishment is to look at the case caption. If there’s a judgment, it will list the court file number and date of the judgment. If there isn’t a judgment, it will say something like “subject to Minnesota Statutes 571.71, subd. 2.”

Debt collectors occasionally mess up this process. I've seen cases where they do a pre-judgment garnishment even though the defendant has answered the lawsuit. I've also seen cases where they garnish without sending the Notice of Intent to Garnish.

---

You Can Sue for Wrongful Garnishment

If a debt collector violates the FDCPA through a wrongful garnishment, you can sue them and hold them accountable for their illegal conduct. You can sue even if you owe the debt. If you win the case, you get: (1) $1,000 in statutory damages; (2) any provable actual damages--such as out-of-pocket loss or emotional distress; (3) the collector has to pay your attorney fees; and (4) the collector has to pay your court costs. Most consumer rights attorneys take FDCPA cases on contingent fee arrangements, which means you don’t have to pay any attorney fees up front.

---

What’s Next in This Series

This is Part 4 of our Minnesota Garnishment Guide. Next, we cover:

Part 1—Garnishment Basics
Part 2—How to Stop Garnishment
Part 3—Claiming Garnishment Exemptions

Ready to talk to a lawyer about garnishment?
Schedule a consult with debt defense lawyer Todd Murray.

Since 2009, Todd has helped hundreds of Minnesotans defend garnishments. His work has saved his clients millions of dollars (and many sleepless nights) in the process. Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

The Minnesota Debt Collection Lawsuit Guide: Part 1—Summons & Complaint

This is part one of a three-part series about debt collection lawsuits in Minnesota:

Part 2—The Answer
Part 3—After the Answer

What is a Debt Collection Summons?

A debt collection summons is a notice that you’re being sued to collect a debt. The summons is accompanied by the complaint, which details the allegations the creditor is making against you. We refer to a summons and complaint, collectively, as a “lawsuit.”

---

What Does it Mean to Be “Served” With a Summons?

“Served” is just a fancy word for “notified.” Under the court rules, the defendant must get notice of the summons and complaint. This is typically done through personal service—where the summons is given directly to the defendant. A summons and complaint can also be served by leaving it with a person of “suitable age and discretion” at the defendant’s residence. In rare circumstances, a summons and complaint can be served by mail or even by publication in a newspaper.

---

Why Doesn’t the Summons Have a Court File Number on It?

In most states, debt collectors must file a case with the court before they can serve the summons and complaint on the defendant.

In Minnesota, however, the rules are different. Here, the summons and complaint can be served on the defendant without being filed with the court. This is called “pocket filing.” Because the case isn’t filed with the court at the time of service, it won’t have a court file number on it. And if you were to call the court and ask about the case, they would have no idea what you’re talking about.

Don’t be fooled by this. Just because the summons doesn’t have a court file number on it doesn’t mean that it isn’t valid. You still have to properly respond to the summons and complaint or you will lose the case by default.

---

So, What Do I Do With the Summons?

If you’re like many people, you’re tempted to do nothing and wait until you get a court date. Unfortunately, this common thinking is a huge mistake.

In Minnesota, you must answer a summons and complaint within 21 days of the date you are served. If you don’t, the creditor will apply for a default judgment. In a default case, the court considers all of the allegations in the complaint as true and gives the creditor whatever they’re asking for. In other words, the debt collector wins automatically—not because they have a better case, but because you didn't participate. In debt collection cases, a default judgment is entered administratively by a court clerk without a court hearing. In fact, in a default, a judge will never even see the case.

A default judgment is a court ruling that you owe the creditor money. And once a creditor has a judgment, they have the power to garnish your bank account and your paycheck.  Although default judgments can occasionally be overturned, for the most part they are final.

This is why it’s so important to answer a debt collection lawsuit within the 21 days. If you don't, you no longer can raise any defenses and will probably have to either negotiate a settlement or consider bankruptcy.

---

What’s Next in This Series

This is Part 1 of our Minnesota Debt Collection Lawsuit Guide. We also cover:

Part 2—The Answer
Part 3—After the Answer

Ready to talk to a lawyer about your collection lawsuit?
Schedule a consult with debt defense lawyer Todd Murray.

Since 2009, Todd has helped hundreds of Minnesotans defend debt collection lawsuits. His work has saved his clients millions of dollars (and many sleepless nights). Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

The Minnesota Debt Collection Lawsuit Guide: Part 2—The Answer

This is part two of a three-part series about debt collection lawsuits in Minnesota:

Part 1—The Summons & Complaint
Part 3—After the Answer

---

How to Answer a Debt Lawsuit in Minnesota

An answer is a formal legal document that responds to each of the allegations in the creditor's complaint. A phone call or letter isn't sufficient. Here are the five steps for answering a Minnesota collection lawsuit.

---

Step # 1: Fill out the case caption

Start your answer by filling out the case caption. This is where the name of the county and judicial district are listed. It's also where the plaintiff and defendant's names appear. You can basically copy the caption for your answer directly from the summons. Just change the title of the document from "summons" to "answer." When you're done, it should look something like this:

---

Step # 2: Respond to all of the allegations in the complaint

The body of your answer is where you respond to the allegations in the complaint. There are basically three responses to an allegation: (1) admit; (2) deny; and (3) deny based on a lack of information. It's probably best for your answer to have a separate paragraph that responds to each paragraph in the complaint:

Your responses must be truthful, so if you know that the allegation is true, you have to admit for. For example, if the collection lawsuit alleges that you live in Hennepin County and you live in Hennepin County, you have to admit it. On the other hand, if the lawsuit alleges that you live in Hennepin County and you live in Ramsey County, then you must deny that allegation.

Many times, you won't know the answer to an allegation. For example, many debt buyer lawsuits allege that the debt buyer purchased the account from the original creditor. Since you weren't a party to this transaction, you have no way to know if this allegation is true or not. So it's usually best to deny the allegation based on a lack of information. You only have to admit something that you know for a fact is true.

You should also watch out for multiple allegations in a paragraph. It's possible to admit one part of an allegation and to deny another. Read each allegation carefully and be sure to respond to all of its parts and sub-parts.

---

Step # 3: Add your affirmative defenses

The next step is to add your defenses. These should include any reason why you don't think you owe the money or why the creditor shouldn't win the case. Here's an example:

So what defenses should you include? Keep in mind, of course, that there has to be a truthful factual basis for any defense you include in your answer. With that caveat in mind, here are four defenses that should defeat a collection lawsuit and three that won't get you anywhere:

• Good defense: Statute of limitations. The statute of limitations is the amount of time set by law for a creditor to start a lawsuit against you. In Minnesota, for example, the statute of limitations for most credit card lawsuits is six years. Other types of debt have different statutes of limitations. For example, a car loan typically has a four year statute of limitations.

  Keep in mind that the statute of limitations provides that the lawsuit has to be started within the required time. It doesn't mean that the lawsuit has to be finished within that time.

  Once you know what the statute of limitations is, you need to determine when it starts to run in your case. Generally, the statute of limitations begins to run on the first day that you are in default on your account. A quick way to figure out when your account went into default is to determine the date that you made your last regular payment. Although this won't always be a precise date that the statute of limitations began to run, it's a good estimate.

  When you know the applicable statute of limitations and the date it started in your case, the rest is just simple math. Using Minnesota's six-year statute of limitations as an example again, if you defaulted on your account on December 15, 2015, the creditor must start the lawsuit against you no later than December 15, 2021.

• Bad defense: Financial hardship. Unfortunately, the fact that you can't afford to pay is not a defense to a collection lawsuit. The issue in a collection case is whether you're legally obligated to pay, not whether you can afford to pay. That fact that you're unemployed, receive public assistance, or are otherwise "judgment proof" may mean that the debt collector will never collect any money from you. But it's not a legal defense to a collection lawsuit.

  Similarly, the fact that the debt collector refused to work out reasonable payment arrangements with you is not a valid defense. While it can be frustrating when a debt collector won't work with you, a court doesn't have the power to force a creditor to accept a settlement or payment plan.

• Good defense: Unauthorized use or fraud. Federal law provides that a cardholder is not liable for the unauthorized use of a credit card. The cardholder is not required to notify the issuer of the unauthorized charges to use this defense in a collection case. The creditor bears the burden of showing that the use of the card was authorized and the creditor probably can't meet its burden of proof by merely submitting billing statements and asserting the cardholder never objected to them.

• Bad defense: No signed contract. In credit card cases, creditors typically don't have to produce a signed contract to win the case. Instead, credit card cases are often brought under a legal doctrine called "account stated." Account stated is claim where the creditor must show that the defendant received billing statements and didn't object to them. There are defenses to this argument, particularly if the plaintiff is a debt-buyer, but the point is that a signed contract doesn't have to be produced for the creditor to win.

• Good defense: I already paid off this account. This goes without saying. If you've already paid off the account, you don't have to pay it again. In legal jargon, this defense is called accord and satisfaction.

• Bad defense: Divorce decree says my ex has to pay. Just because your divorce decree ruled that your ex is solely responsible for payment doesn't mean you can't be sued for the account too. Divorce courts don't have the power to modify contracts between you and a third-party creditor.

• Good defense: No evidence of assignment. Many collection lawsuits are brought by debt buyers. Debt buyers are companies who buy debts for pennies on the dollar and file lawsuits to collect the full balance. Because of this, it's not enough for the debt buyer to show that you owe the original creditor money. They also have to prove that they have been assigned the debt and are its current owner.

---

Step # 4: Sign the answer

After listing all of your affirmative defenses, you must sign your answer. When you sign, you're attesting that everything in the answer is truthful and that you're not using the answer for an improper purpose, such as to harass the other side or to commit fraud on the court. You should include your address and phone number in the signature block:

---

Step # 5: Mail the answer to the plaintiff’s lawyer

Once you've completed the answer, make two copies. You serve one copy of the answer by mailing it to the debt collector's lawyer. It's best fill out a sworn statement, called an affidavit of service, to prove when you served the answer. You can also just mail the answer certified with a return receipt.

Keep  the second copy of your answer for your records. You'll need to file it with the court once the creditor opens a court file.

---

What’s Next in This Series

This is Part 2 of our Minnesota Debt Collection Lawsuit Guide. We also cover:

Part 1—The Summons & Complaint
Part 3—After the Answer

Ready to talk to a lawyer about your collection lawsuit?
Schedule a consult with debt defense lawyer Todd Murray.

Since 2009, Todd has helped hundreds of Minnesotans defend debt collection lawsuits. His work has saved his clients millions of dollars (and many sleepless nights). Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

The Minnesota Debt Collection Lawsuit Guide: Part 3—After the Answer

This is part three of a three-part series about debt collection lawsuits in Minnesota:

Part 1—The Summons & Complaint
Part 2—The Answer

---

Now that you’ve served your answer to the collection lawsuit, you’re probably wondering what happens next. After all, the answer is only the beginning of the contested part of the case.

Here’s an overview of the remaining steps of the process.

Step 1 -- Initial Disclosures and Discovery Plan

After the answer is served, the parties are required to confer about the case and develop a plan for discovery (Step 2, below). This conference, which can be by phone, is required to take place within 30 days of the original due date for the Answer. Most debt collection law firms will send a letter to set up the conference.

The parties are also required  to disclose all known witnesses and supporting documents, as well as to itemize the claimed damages and describe any insurance coverage for the claims, at this stage of the case. These are known as Rule 26 initial disclosures and must be sent to the other side within 60 days of the original due date for the Answer.

---

Step 2 -- Discovery

Once the discovery conference takes place , the next step in a debt collection lawsuit is discovery. If the case has not been filed with the court, there is no explicit time frame for discovery to happen and the parties are free to serve discovery whenever they wish. Once the case is filed with the court, the court will issue a deadline for discovery to be completed by.

Discovery is simply an opportunity for the parties to exchange information about the claims and defenses involved in a case. Discovery is not compulsory and a party is only required to provide information if they're properly asked. The most common forms of discovery in a debt collection case are Interrogatories, Request for Production of Documents, and Requests for Admission. Interrogatories are basically just questions that one party asks of the other. Requests for Production of Documents, as the name implies, requires that certain documents related to the case be produced. And Requests for Admission are essentially true or false questions about the claims or defenses in the case.

To request discovery, a party has to properly serve their Interrogatories, Requests for Production of Documents, or Requests for Admission. Written discovery is usually served by mailing the requests to the other side. The other party then has 30 days from the day the discovery was served to respond fully. Simply mailing a letter to the other side asking them to provide information about the case is not sufficient and doesn't trigger the other side's duty to respond.

Requests for Admission are probably the most critical part of discovery, because if they are not responded to within 30 days, they are considered admitted. Creditors write their Requests for Admission carefully so that if the consumer doesn't respond to them, they will end up admitting each element of the creditor's claims. I've seen cases where the only evidence that the creditor put in front of the judge was the consumer's failure to respond to the Requests for Admission.

---

Step 3 -- Filing the Case With the Court

In 2013, the court rules were changed to require that cases be filed with the court and brought under court supervision within one year from the date the Complaint was served. If the case isn't filed within the one-year time limit, it is automatically dismissed with prejudice and can't be re-started. The rules allow the parties to agree to extend this deadline, but there rarely is a reason for a defendant in a debt collection lawsuit to agree to extend this deadline.

To file the case, each party must file their initial pleading (ie. the Complaint or the Answer) and pay the court filing fee, which is about $300. The parties also have to file their discovery plan from Step 1 above. Once the case is filed, it will typically be assigned to a judge and the court will issue a schedule with deadlines for the case.

---

Step 4 -- Summary Judgment Motion

The next step in the majority of debt collection lawsuits is the creditor's summary judgment motion. This is a hearing in front of a judge where the creditor will offer all of its evidence and legal arguments and ask the judge to give them a judgment. Defending a summary judgment motion is a complicated process, but essentially it requires the consumer to file a brief with his legal arguments, any written testimony that he wishes the court to consider, and any documents that he wants the court to review. There is a hearing where the judge will ask questions of both sides. The judge then considers all of the arguments and evidence and decides whether the creditor is entitled to a judgment. If the judge rules in favor of the creditor, a judgment is entered and the case is over. If the judge rules against the creditor, then the case will proceed to trial.

---

Step 5 -- Mediation

In most cases, the court requires the parties to engage in mediation. Mediation involves a neutral third-party, sometimes a retired judge, that tries to help the parties resolve their differences and settle the case. The parties usually have to bear the cost of hiring a mediator, although more and more courts are offering low-cost mediation for qualifying cases and parties. The mediator can't require you to settle the case, but they can help you see the benefits of settlement and propose different settlement options.

---

Step 6 -- Pre-Trial and Trial

If you're fortunate enough to defeat the creditor's summary judgment motion and the parties don't settle at mediation, the next step in a debt collection lawsuit will be a trial. The judge will issue detailed instructions about the time leading up to trial. There are so many variables at this point that it's difficult to describe all the potential scenarios. If you get to this point, you would benefit greatly from discussing your case with an attorney. You have a great deal of leverage to get the case resolved if you defeat the summary judgment motion and an experienced consumer attorney can help you maximize that leverage to get the best possible outcome.

---

A Final Word -- the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is a federal law that regulates what debt collectors can and can't do when collecting debts. The FDCPA applies even if you owe the debt. If you're involved in a debt collection lawsuit, you should to educate yourself about the FDCPA.

Basically, a debt collector can't harass you, lie to you, or use any unfair collection tactics. If a debt collector violates the FDCPA, you can sue it for up to $1,000, plus any actual damages. The debt collector also has to pay your attorney fees and costs if you win your FDCPA case. A FDCPA claim can often be brought as a counterclaim in a debt collection lawsuit, which often will give you additional leverage to get the suit resolved.

---

What’s Next in This Series

This is Part 3 of our Minnesota Debt Collection Lawsuit Guide. We also cover:

Part 1—The Summons & Complaint
Part 2—The Answer

Ready to talk to a lawyer about your collection lawsuit?
Schedule a consult with debt defense lawyer Todd Murray.

Since 2009, Todd has helped hundreds of Minnesotans defend debt collection lawsuits. His work has saved his clients millions of dollars (and many sleepless nights). Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

Learned Your Odometer Was Rolled Back? A Complete Guide for Minnesota Car Buyers

Discovering your car’s odometer was rolled back feels like a punch in the gut. You thought you were buying reliability, instead, you’ve been cheated. You’re not alone. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, more than 450,000 vehicles are sold every year with false odometer readings, costing buyers over $1 billion annually.

If you’ve just learned you’re one of these unlucky buyers, here’s everything you need to know about odometer rollbacks in Minnesota and what you can do about it.

---

What Is an Odometer Rollback?

An odometer rollback happens when the mileage reading on a vehicle is altered to make it look like the car has been driven less than it really has. Modern vehicles use computers to track and display mileage and scammers use “mileage correction” tools to plug into the system and change the numbers.

Indeed, a quick search for “odometer rollback tool” returns a bunch of “mileage correction” devices:

---

Why Odometer Fraud Matters

Odometer rollbacks aren’t just a technicality. They create real harm:

• Financial Loss: You overpaid, often by thousands of dollars.

• Resale Problems: You’ll never be able to trade the vehicle in. Dealers and private buyers check Carfax, and once an odometer discrepancy is noted, resale value collapses.

• Safety Risks: Higher-mileage cars have more wear and tear, making them less safe than you thought.

---

How to Spot an Odometer Rollback

If you suspect your vehicle’s odometer has been altered, here’s what to check:

• Vehicle history report (Carfax, AutoCheck): Look for mileage discrepancies.

• Maintenance records: Oil changes and service receipts show mileage at the time. Check glove boxes, seats, and door stickers for past records.

• Title history: Request a full history from the Minnesota DMV. Older titles may reveal inconsistencies.

• Physical wear: A car with “low mileage” shouldn’t have worn pedals, sagging seats, or faded steering wheels.

• Mechanic inspection: A trusted mechanic can spot if the car looks far more “used” than the odometer suggests.

---

Minnesota and Federal Odometer Fraud Laws

Both federal and state law make odometer tampering illegal.

• Federal Law (49 U.S.C. §32701): Prohibits tampering with odometers and requires truthful mileage disclosures.

• Minnesota Law (Minn. Stat. §325E.14): Makes odometer fraud a crime and provides remedies for victims.

Penalties include:

• Civil damages: At least $10,000 or three times your actual damages (whichever is greater).

• Attorney’s fees and costs: If you win, the dealer must pay your lawyer and court costs.

• Criminal penalties: Jail time and fines for violators.

---

What Are My Legal Rights?

If you’ve been a victim of odometer fraud in Minnesota or Western Wisconsin, you can take action:

• Sue the dealer who sold the vehicle with a false odometer reading.

• Recover damages: Refunds, compensation for lost value, and out of pocket loss.

• Pay nothing upfront: At Friedman Murray, we handle these cases on contingency, meaning we only get paid if you win.

• Important Note: We only take cases against licensed dealers. We generally cannot help with private-party transactions. Documentation (Carfax, repair records, title history) is required to build your case.

---

FAQ: Odometer Rollbacks in Minnesota

How common is odometer fraud in Minnesota? Very. The NHTSA estimates over 450,000 cars are sold with false readings each year. Minnesota, with its heavy used-car market, is no exception.

Can I sue if the dealer didn’t personally roll it back? Yes. The law prohibits sellers from knowingly making false mileage disclosures — even if they weren’t the ones who altered it.

What if I bought from a private seller? While you may have legal claims if the private seller broke the law, our firm only handles cases against licensed dealers.

Just learned your vehicle’s odometer was rolled back?
Get a consult with auto fraud attorney Todd Murray.

Since 2009, Todd has been helping Minnesotans combat fraudulent auto sales by used car dealers. His work has returned hundreds of thousands of dollars to his clients’ pockets and has improved the legal protections for used car buyers throughout the state. Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

How to stop collection calls from a harassing debt collector

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act gives you the right to stop collection calls. All you have to do is send the debt collector a letter telling them to cease all communications. There is no magic language required--just say in plain-English that you don't want them to contact you anymore. Keep a copy of the letter for your records and mail it certified with a return receipt so you can prove that the collector received it. Once the collector receives your letter, they must stop contacting you immediately. There are a few caveats here, though:

• If you want to resolve the debt, you may not want to stop all calls. If your goal is to work something out with the debt collector, you probably want to keep the lines of communication open. But if you can't afford to pay or if the debt collector harasses you, it may make sense to cease all future calls.

• The cease request will not stop any legal action. The FDCPA only requires that the debt collector cease communications with you. Courts have found that a person's cease request does not require a collector to stop or forego any collection lawsuits or garnishments.

• The cease request only applies to the collector you send it to. Many debt collectors will respond to a cease letter by transferring the account to a different debt collector. In most cases, your cease request to the first debt collector won't apply to a subsequent debt collector. You will likely have to send that subsequent collector another cease letter.

• Debt collection scammers may not honor your letter. Unfortunately, there are a few debt collection scammers out there. These fraudsters are just trying to get your money--there may not even be valid debt. Compliance with the FDCPA is not a high priority for a scammer, so they probably won't honor your cease request. The best thing to do with these scammers is to make it clear to them that you refuse to pay.

• If a debt collector receives your cease letter and continues to contact you, they've probably violated the FDCPA. One of the most important rights the FDCPA gives a person is the right to stop collection calls. If a collector violates this right, they should be held accountable for their illegal conduct. Consider talking to a lawyer in your area who sues debt collectors under the FDCPA.

---

Ready to talk to a lawyer about stopping debt harassment?
Schedule a free consult with FDCPA attorney Todd Murray.

Todd has been suing harassing debt collectors since 2009. He has recovered hundreds of thousands of dollars for his clients and has held the debt collection industry accountable when it resorts to illegal collection tactics. Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

Can a debt collector call you at work?

Jen is an administrative assistant at a small dental clinic. She recently got divorced and is struggling to keep up with her bills on just one income. She's missed a few credit card payments and got a couple collection notices in the mail.

One day, while she was sitting at her desk, a debt collector called. The collector made Jen confirm her social security number and date of birth and then asked how she planned to take care of her unpaid credit card bill. Worried that her co-workers would overhear the conversation, Jen quickly told the collector that she was at work and couldn't take personal calls.

A few days later, the same debt collector called Jen again on her work phone. This time, he threatened to garnish Jen's wages if she didn't set up payment arrangements immediately. Jen again told the collector that she was at work and couldn't talk, and said she would call him back when she was at home.

Was the debt collector's first call illegal? What about the second?

---

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act doesn't expressly forbid a debt collector from calling the workplace. But once a collector knows that someone can't take calls on the job, further calls are prohibited.

So in Jen’s case, the first call wasn’t illegal because, until that point, the collector didn’t know that Jen couldn’t talk at work. But once Jen told the collector that she couldn’t take personal calls, the collector knew not to call anymore. Therefore, the second collection call violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Collection calls to someone else at your work are almost always illegal

What if instead of calling Jen’s direct line, the collector had called the receptionist and asked to speak to Jen about an unpaid bill?

Illegal. Big-time. Virtually every collection call to a co-worker is illegal, especially if the collector mentions the debt. There is an exception, though, if the collector calls to enforce a court judgment. For example, a collector may call your human resources department to discuss the logistics of a pending wage garnishment against you.

How to use the FDCPA to stop illegal collection calls to your workplace

The FDCPA gives you the power to sue a debt collector that violates the law. It's a great way to stop illegal collection calls to your work and to hold the debt collector accountable for its illegal conduct. Under the FDCPA, a successful claim gets you:

• Up to $1,000 in statutory damages (even if you've suffered no monetary loss);

• Provable actual damages (including for emotional distress);

• Your attorney fees and court costs must be paid by the collector

Most consumer lawyers handle FDCPA lawsuits on a contingency fee. This means that you don't pay any fees unless your attorney recovers money for you and those fees come from the collector's pocket, not yours. Congress wrote the FDCPA this way to incentivize people to enforce the FDCPA and help the government regulate debt collectors and ensure compliance with the law.

---

Ready to talk to a lawyer about stopping debt harassment?
Schedule a free consult with FDCPA attorney Todd Murray.

Todd has been suing harassing debt collectors since 2009. He has recovered hundreds of thousands of dollars for his clients and has held the debt collection industry accountable when it resorts to illegal collection tactics. Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

Can a debt collector call your friends and family?

Andre is a 30-year old who works in sales for a medical device company. Although he makes a decent living now, he struggled financially in his 20s and has a few debts in collections due to his over-reliance on credit cards after college.

Andre has been dating Stephanie for nearly a year now and they’ve recently talked about moving in together. Andre hasn’t figured out yet how to tell Stephanie about his credit card debt.

One night, Stephanie mentions that she’s been getting a bunch of calls from an unknown number for the last few weeks. Stephanie never answered any of the calls and the caller never left a voicemail. Until today. Curious who’s been calling her over and over, Stephanie finally answered the phone. Turns out, it was a debt collector who told Stephanie he was trying to get in touch with Andre about an unpaid credit card bill.

When Stephanie told Andre this, he was humiliated. Although she says that she understands, Andre thinks that she’s having second thoughts about moving in with him.

Were the collector’s repeated calls to Stephanie illegal?

---

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act forbids a debt collector from communicating with your friends and family. In fact, collection communications to most third-parties are illegal.

The key to understanding the extent to this rule, though, is the word “communicate.” The law defines “communicate” as the conveying of information about a debt. So, for example, a missed call with no voicemail probably is not a “communication” because no information about a debt was conveyed. Therefore, the collection calls that Stephanie didn't answer weren't illegal because the collector didn't "communicate" anything about a debt. But the call that Stephanie picked up where the collector told her about Andre's debt was an illegal communication with a third party.

Communications with certain third parties are allowed

There are a few exceptions to the general rule, though. A collector is allowed to communicate with a couple of people without breaking the law, including:

• your spouse

• your attorney

• the debt collector's attorney

• the creditor (ie. the debt collector's client)

• the creditor's attorney

• a credit reporting agency (ie. Equifax, Experian, TransUnion, etc);

A collector may also communicate with your employer if it's necessary to enforce a court judgment. For example, a debt collector who has a judgment against someone and wants to garnish his wages can call that person’s employer to confirm that he works there.

A collector may also communicate with a third-party to learn your contact information

Another exception to the general rule against third-party communications is the "location information" exception. The law allows debt collectors to call friends or family to learn your address and phone number. But this call is strictly regulated:

• the collector must identify himself and tell your friend that he is confirming your location information;

• the collector can't identify his employer unless your friend asks;

• the collector can't tell your friend that you owe a debt or discuss the details of the debt;

• in most cases, the collector can't ask your friend to have you call the collector back;

• in most cases, the collector only gets to make this "location information" call one time

Understand, however, that if the collector already knows your address and phone number, then it has no need to call a third party to get your location information.

HOW TO USE THE FDCPA TO STOP ILLEGAL COLLECTION CALLS TO third parties

The FDCPA allows you to sue a debt collector who violates the law. It's a great way to stop illegal collection calls to you friends and family and to hold the debt collector accountable for its conduct. Under the FDCPA, a successful claim gets you:

• Up to $1,000 in statutory damages (even if you've suffered no monetary loss);

• Provable actual damages (including for emotional distress);

• Your attorney fees and court costs must be paid by the collector

Most consumer lawyers handle FDCPA lawsuits on a contingency fee. This means that you don't pay any fees unless your attorney recovers money for you and those fees come from the collector's pocket, not yours. Congress wrote the FDCPA this way to incentivize people to enforce the FDCPA and help the government regulate debt collectors and ensure compliance with the law.

---

Ready to talk to a lawyer about stopping debt harassment?
Schedule a free consult with FDCPA attorney Todd Murray.

Todd has been suing harassing debt collectors since 2009. He has recovered hundreds of thousands of dollars for his clients and has held the debt collection industry accountable when it resorts to illegal collection tactics. Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

Stop collection calls for someone else's debt

One of the most frequent complaints received by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is when a collector hounds a consumer for someone else’s debt. It's unclear whether these collectors are intentionally pursuing the wrong person or if they've made a legitimate mistake.

If you're getting calls or letters from a collector for someone else's debt, you probably don't care why it's happening, you just want the collection attempts to stop. Here are some suggestions to stop collection calls for someone else.

Collection calls for someone else’s Debt

If a debt collector is calling or writing you about a debt that you don't owe, the first thing you should do is tell them very clearly that they have the wrong person and that this is someone else's debt. Be polite but firm. The collector may ask you to confirm the last four digits of your social security number or a similar personal identifier. While it may be unwise to give the collector your full social security number, there probably isn't too much risk in giving them the last four digits to confirm that the debt isn't yours. The collector may ask you if you know the actual account-holder and how to reach them. While you're under no obligation to do so, you may consider passing along the other person's information if you know it.

In addition to verbally telling the collector that it is someone else's debt, you may consider sending a follow-up letter confirming what you told them. Identify yourself in the letter and then write something like: "you called me on this date at this number. I am not the person who owes this debt. Please stop contacting me." If you know any details about the account in question, include a reference to those in your letter to be sure the collector can properly identify the account. Send this letter certified mail with a return receipt and keep a copy of the letter and receipt for your records.

You should also keep detailed records of any additional collection attempts after you've notified the collector that the debt isn't yours. Keep track of the time, dates, and duration of any additional calls and save any voice messages. If you think the calls are robocalls, make a note of that and why you think so. Also, keep copies of any letters or other documents that they send you.

It's also a good idea to check your credit reports to make sure the other person's debt isn't listed on your reports. Use Annual Credit Report to get free copies of your credit reports from the three major credit reporting agencies. Once you have the reports, make sure that the other person's account isn't showing up on your credit report. If it is, you should send a dispute letter to each of the credit bureaus incorrectly reporting that account.

If you've told the debt collector that you are not the right person and continue to get collection calls for someone else, it's time to talk to a consumer rights attorney to discuss the situation in more detail. In addition to helping you stop the collection attempts, a consumer attorney can advise you whether you have any claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act against the debt collector. If the debt doesn't belong to you, you've told the collector that, and the collector still keeps calling, the collector deserves to get sued under the FDCPA and be held accountable for harassing an innocent person.

Collection lawsuit for a debt that isn't yours

If you get served with a collection lawsuit for someone else's debt, you need to take additional steps. You should do everything suggested above, but you also have to submit an answer to the lawsuit. In Minnesota, the answer must be submitted within 20 days. An answer is a formal legal document that responds to each of the allegations in the complaint. If the debt isn't yours, you should be able to deny most of the allegations in the lawsuit. You should also note somewhere in your answer that the debt is someone else's. Even if you don't owe the debt, you have to answer the lawsuit. Failure to respond to the lawsuit will likely result in a default judgment against you. A default judgment can be difficult (and expensive) to overturn, even if the debt isn't yours. It may also lead to garnishments and other unpleasantness.

Because the consequences of a collection lawsuit are quite serious, you should strongly consider discussing your situation with a consumer lawyer. A consumer lawyer can help you prepare an answer to the lawsuit and also advise you if you have possible counterclaims against the debt collector for pursuing the wrong person.

Ready to talk to a lawyer about stopping debt harassment?
Schedule a free consult with FDCPA attorney Todd Murray.

Todd has been suing harassing debt collectors since 2009. He has recovered hundreds of thousands of dollars for his clients and has held the debt collection industry accountable when it resorts to illegal collection tactics. Todd’s clients have described him as “very professional and easy to work with.” He lives in Minneapolis with his wife and four children.

Building credit after bankruptcy

In an earlier post, we told you about the effect bankruptcy can have on your credit score. People who put in some effort to rebuild their credit after bankruptcy can usually make their score rise a lot faster than people who just wait for their credit to fix itself. here we give you some tips for boosting your credit score after bankruptcy.

Check-up on your credit report

After filing bankruptcy, it's important to make sure that your creditors have wiped your debts clean, or at least noted that the debt was discharged in your case. If old pre-bankruptcy debts come back to haunt you, they can drag down your score. That's why for our clients, we offer a free check-up appointment after a bankruptcy case is finished. We'll look over your credit report to make sure everything that was supposed to be wiped out was wiped out. If any accounts are still showing as active or in collection, we may use the Fair Credit Reporting Act to fix your report.

Secured credit cards

After bankruptcy, you might not be eligible to get a new credit card, or the cards you can get might not be the ones you want (watch out for sky-high rates, and predatory contract terms from the credit cards that solicit recent bankruptcy filers). Secured credit cards work like this: you give the credit card company some money for collateral (say, $500) and they give you a credit limit equal to the amount of collateral. But you use it like a credit card--your charges don't draw down the collateral--the money you deposited just stays on file in case you default on the debt. And unlike a debit card, your on-time payments will help boost your score.

You can get a secured card by comparing cards on bankrate.com. But it might be an even better idea to approach a local bank or credit union that you have a strong relationship with--they might offer low-cost products that are meant to help you without all the tricks and traps.

Eventually, get an unsecured credit card

Often, after a year or so of on-time payments, the secured credit card company will return the collateral money and convert the account into a full-fledged credit card. A few months of on-time payments may also qualify you for more credit. Gas and store credit cards will probably be easiest to get, although they don't have quite the same score-boosting effect as major bank credit cards do. But remember what got you into trouble in the first place--pay off your balances in full every month, and watch out for sleazy credit card practices that might get you back in trouble.

Stay away from credit repair scams

There are services out there that claim they can fix your credit for a fee. But these services aren't worth the hassle. First of all, some of them will commit fraud to by trying to remove negative, but true information from your credit report, which may get you into more trouble in the long run. Also, you can probably do anything they'd do for you on your own without spending the money. In particular, stay away from any service that want money upfront for fixing your credit--this is prohibited by the Credit Repair Organizations Act, a federal law that governs credit-fixing agencies.

If you've filed bankruptcy and want help rebuilding your credit, or just considering bankruptcy and want to know what the impact on your credit will be, give us a call.